Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
                                            Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                            
                                                
                                             What is a DOI Number?
                                        
                                    
                                
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
- 
            Accurate mapping of headwater streams and their flow status has important implications for understanding and managing water resources and land uses. However, accurate information is rare, especially in rugged, forested terrain. We developed a streamflow permanence classification model for forested lands in western Oregon using the latest light detection and ranging‐derived hydrography published in the National Hydrography Dataset. Models were trained using 2,518 flow/no flow field observations collected in late summer 2019–2021 across headwaters of 129 sub‐watersheds. The final model, the Western Oregon WeT DRy model, used Random Forest and 13 environmental covariates for classifying every 5‐m stream sub‐reach across 426 sub‐watersheds. The most important covariates were annual precipitation and drainage area. Model output included probabilities of late summer surface flow presence and were subsequently categorized into three streamflow permanence classes—Wet, Dry, and Ambiguous. Ambiguous denoted model probabilities and associated prediction intervals that extended over the 50% classification threshold between wet and dry. Model accuracy was 0.83 for sub‐watersheds that contained training data and decreased to 0.67 for sub‐watersheds that did not have observations of late summer surface flow. The model identified where predictions extrapolated beyond the domain characterized by the training data. The combination of spatially continuous estimates of late summer streamflow status along with uncertainty and extrapolation estimates provide critical information for strategic project planning and designing additional field data collection.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available July 1, 2026
- 
            Abstract Adaptive plasticity in thermal tolerance traits may buffer organisms against changing temperatures, making such responses of particular interest in the face of global climate change. Although population variation is integral to the evolvability of this trait, many studies inferring proxies of physiological vulnerability from thermal tolerance traits extrapolate data from one or a few populations to represent the species. Estimates of physiological vulnerability can be further complicated by methodological effects associated with experimental design. We evaluated how populations varied in their acclimation capacity (i.e., the magnitude of plasticity) for critical thermal maximum (CTmax) in two species of tailed frogs (Ascaphidae), cold‐stream specialists. We used the estimates of acclimation capacity to infer physiological vulnerability to future warming. We performed CTmax experiments on tadpoles from 14 populations using a fully factorial experimental design of two holding temperatures (8 and 15°C) and two experimental starting temperatures (8 and 15°C). This design allowed us to investigate the acute effects of transferring organisms from one holding temperature to a different experimental starting temperature, as well as fully acclimated responses by using the same holding and starting temperature. We found that most populations exhibited beneficial acclimation, where CTmax was higher in tadpoles held at a warmer temperature, but populations varied markedly in the magnitude of the response and the inferred physiological vulnerability to future warming. We also found that the response of transferring organisms to different starting temperatures varied substantially among populations, although accounting for acute effects did not greatly alter estimates of physiological vulnerability at the species level or for most populations. These results underscore the importance of sampling widely among populations when inferring physiological vulnerability, as population variation in acclimation capacity and thermal sensitivity may be critical when assessing vulnerability to future warming.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
